Kemlo and the Satellite Builders by E C Eliott
Posted in Reading Reviewed, Science Fiction at 12:00 on 7 June 2014
Illustrated by George Craig. Nelson, 1960, 186p.

I bought this in a charity shop in Linlithgow. One time I was there they had a swatch of (overpriced) E C Eliott books with wonderfully nostalgic covers – in particular one called Tas and the Postal Rocket. On my next visit most had gone but this one had been brought down from a frankly ridiculous £19.99 to something more reasonable for a book without its dust-jacket. At the same time I bought a Prof A M Low book of similar vintage.
This is perhaps what was once called a juvenile – young adult would be pushing it a bit; it’s definitely not a grown-up kind of tale. Kemlo is a Space Scout, brought up in space on a satellite as part of a quasi-military organisation. Space infants are kept in a nursery looked after by their mothers and nurses. Scouts graduate to their own quarters between the ages of six and nine. The boys’ and girls’ quarters are separate – and this is all we hear of the girls. Despite this apparent distancing and a large degree of control over their own activities the Scouts still have reverence for and defer to their parents who can visit at any time but are mostly absent. Nevertheless Kemlo’s relationship with his father and mother seems not very different from one in a “normal” family.
The story is a farrago of nonsense about the imminent building of a huge satellite mixed in with a rudimentary plot about the extension of the restrictive social arrangements down on Earth up into the space environment. There is also a load of guff about weightlessness and gravity. The station has gravity “rays” and levers which can switch gravity on and off. For some odd reason – unexplained here – the Scouts all have names which begin with K. There are lumps of info dumping and conversations which exist only to outline or advance the plot.
Spookily there is a chief engineer who speaks in Scotticisms. Perhaps Gene Roddenberry read Kemlo books! By the way I’ve still to find the plaque in Linlithgow to Star Trek’s Scotty, the one that says he’ll be born there in 2222 or something. Apparently it’s in Annet House Museum.
Kemlo and the Satellite Builders is firmly of its time in its social and political attitudes but there is something unabashedly optimistic in it. And the illustrations are a retro delight. Not that that redeems its many failures.
Pedants’ corner:- Gravity rays! “We get our power by feeding gravity rays across the generator fins of our power units, because we’ve no natural gravity up here.” So: 1) where does the power for the “gravity rays” come from? 2) the generator fins obviously do not generate, they transform, 3) they do have natural gravity, they just won’t notice its effects because they’re in free-fall.
The Scouts are told the new satellite will, “not be in orbit with Earth. It therefore will not spin on its own axis in order for it maintain the velocity necessary to retain it in an orbit.” Satellites do not need to spin to stay in orbit. Simple velocity (linear, not rotational) balancing the attractive force of Earth is enough.
The Satellite is made of uraniametal, “the strongest and lightest substance known to man.” Really? Substitute least dense for lightest and metal for substance and you might get close. Otherwise a kilo of uraniametal will still be 1,000 times heavier than a gram of lead (or a gram of anything come to that.) Oh; and any gas is much, much “lighter” than the equivalent volume of any solid.
Tags: 1950s books, Children's Fiction, E C Eliott, Gene Roddenberry, Linlithgow, Prof A M Low, Scotty, Star Trek, Tas and the Postal Rocket

GMj
24 May 2024 at 13:13
Think you just miss the point here, it’s very easy to take the point of view of some smart alec 50 plus years ahead of these adventures, but please, try reading it for what it is and remember, the series started in the 1950’s not a week last Thursday as you seem to think
jackdeighton
24 May 2024 at 21:46
GMJ,
I would say – and have said – similar things about a present day book which took such a cavalier attitude to “the laws of physics.” Gravity rays? Switching gravity on and off? No-one should be peddling such nonsense to impressionable youngsters. And there is no such thing as weightlessness – only free-fall. Even in 1960.
Did you read my “pedant’s corner” part? All those comments applied just as much in 1960 as they do today.
If insisting on at least some scientific accuracy is being a smart-alec I plead guilty.
Gmj
7 June 2024 at 20:19
I do take your point about this, but remember,it’s Science Fiction, not hard science, and the books are hugely enjoyable, just suspend belief in the same way as if you were reading Tarzan of The Wizard of Oz and I guarantee you’ll have a great time, scientific accuracy, Star Trek? I think not after all, sound doesn’t travel in space but every sci fi show makes the mistake, I think it’s only Alistair Reynolds who obeys the laws of physics, and maybe Arthur C Clarke, but usually they seem just to be ignored
“ you canna break the laws of physics, Jim” says Scotty and then promptly does. It’s all good fun, and back to Kemlo, quite a few sci authors were influenced by them.
jackdeighton
8 June 2024 at 16:20
Gmj,
Yes it’s Science Fiction, but that doesn’t mean anything goes; otherwise it would be Fantasy. It’s why I also hate the swooshing noises that accompany spaceships in film or TV SF. There have to be some restrictions. How gravity works is one of them.
Inventing stuff in SF is fine – hyperspace drives, wormhole travel – but, at least the first time they are brought into SF’s toolkit, there also needs to be a rationale given for how they might work.