East Stirlingshire 3-1 Dumbarton
Posted in Dumbarton FC at 17:25 on 1 March 2009
Ochilview, 28/2/09
Iâve waited 24 hours to post this and Iâm still angry.
I paid my money yesterday to watch a football game. I got a farce instead.
Quite simply I witnessed the worst refereeing decision of my life; and that is no mean achievement as the competition up to now has been fierce.
1-1 and Dumbarton running the game. The Shire finally get upfield and Andy Rodgers throws himself to the ground. Free-kick â for which the ref was conned.
But that wasnât the worst decision.
From the free-kick the ball eventually gets into the box and a Shire player lets it run away from him. There was no contact with the defending player. One second later the Shire player decides to fall down. When the ref blew I thought he was going to book him for diving. But heâs given a penalty. A penalty! It wasnât even a joke award. It was completely and utterly baffling. Beyond ridiculous. Even the Shire fans on Pie And Bovril donât know what it was for. Two scandalous (I mean that word literally) decisions in a row, both to our detriment. In the resulting protestations Mark Canning got booked. The BBC report even more mystifyingly says the award was for a hand-ball. But the ref played on till the Shire man threw himself down. You don’t play advantage for a handball in the box, surely? You give it straight away.
Not a single Shire player appealed for anything. Neither did their crowd. That tells a story in itself.
The penalty was scored and from then on there was precious little point in Dumbarton continuing playing as the players and fans knew they were not going to get anything from the ref. They did try, though, and we lost a third goal because we were chasing the game.
At half-time my report would have been differentâ¦..
20 mins in I would have taken 1-0. For the Shire.
The goal was conceded direct from a needlessly given away free kick, and neither wall nor goalkeeper covered themselves in glory. And yes, it is nice to have a plan B, humping it up to McLaughlin – who gave us a very decent hold-up or flick on option, but not to the exclusion of everything else. But in that 20 mins Dumbarton were awarded not one single free-kick.
At half-time we should have been 4-2 up as we dominated the latter part; even though they hit the woodwork twice. The 4 would have included the blatant penalty we werenât given when Ross Clark was pushed in the back in the box; a much more obvious foul than the one Shire got in our last encounter at Ochilview. The Shire keeper had several good saves; one incredible one. We lost Ben Gordon with what looked a broken nose or cheek bone and then Ross Clark started limping before half time and didnât reappear. Oh, and not once, but twice, Andy Rodgers ran up to prevent Dumbarton taking a free-kick quickly. Both times he received neither booking nor warning.
Dumbarton should have won this game. In all the Shire keeper had six good saves, the other notable one in the second half with a one-on-one. That we didnât was because we didnât score more than once.
That we lost it, though, was due to refereeing decisions. The penalty in particular.
I donât normally blame the ref for things but this was so outrageous I can not believe it was done innocently.
Seriously, is there no way we can get our money back under the Trades Descriptions Act or something? That wasnât a referee. That was a complete and utter clown. Or worse. Dumbarton should ask â should insist – never to be refereed by him again.
But it wasnât a good way to start the punishing schedule of matches. By the end of Tuesday night we could be fifth.
Itâs going to be hard even to make the play-offs.
And isnât Andy Rodgers a scabrous excuse for a footballer?
Tags: East Stirlingshire

Alan Findlay
1 March 2009 at 18:01
All good point Jack about the ref.
Colin Brown is no stranger to controversy as witnessed when he officiated at SHS during the 5-2 defeat of Berwick.
He was awful that day too but on that ocassion we benefitted mostly from his poor decision making.
In my view, and it’s seemingly a lonely road I’m following, is that whilst yesterday’s penalty decision was just wrong, we had 20 mins to get ourselves back into the game. Injustices happen all the time in football. All the time.
As you say yourself, by the time the ridiculous decision was given, we should have been out of sight. How Mark Peat, one of the best lower division goalies, managed to deny Derek Carcary’s vollwey in the first half I’ll never know. In front of goal we lack the killer touch when needed most.
We need to stop feeling sorry for ourselves and get on with it. A little bit more character is required and we need to be more ruthless. At times yesterday, the ‘Shire lads bullied us off the ball, but that’s what we should expect in the third division.
Big game on Tuesday. Let’s see if we have learned anything.
jackdeighton
2 March 2009 at 13:08
I have received the following comment (which I have edited for the sake of any sensitive souls) from a person calling himself Andy Rogers.
âGet it xxxxx xx ya, you wxxxxer.â
I shall not approve it as a comment as that would allow the sender too much leeway to comment further before any moderation.
Whether it is actually from the footballer I donât know – the spelling of Rogers is different.
If it is, though, firstly I am flattered that he would deign to look at my blog.
Secondly, I note he offers no reasoned argument, nor a rebuttal of what I said about the game on Saturday. In fact he rather confirms my account.
But doubtless he will have the last laugh tomorrow night.
Onebrow
3 March 2009 at 22:46
Or not as the case may be.
Goal difference restored to it’s previous point. Can’t argue with that really.