Archives » Barack Obama

The Cost of Freedom

It was a US citizen, Thomas Jefferson, their third President no less, who said that, “The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.”

That may be the price, but what is the cost?

Looking at the shooting of US Congresswomann Gabrielle Giffords (and 23 others, six of whom died) then it might be said that the cost of freedom is the loss of human life.

US citizens have a remarkable range of freedoms, not the least of which is that of free speech. They also have the freedom to own and use weapons. Both of these are, I understand, constitutionally guaranteed (or at least people believe they are.)

The shooting of Gabrielle Giffords may, however, suggest that these two freedoms might be incompatible.

In June 2010 a website associated with prominent Republican Sarah Palin published a set of targets of Democrats who had voted for President Obama’s health-care reforms and highlighted each of their districts with the cross-hairs of a rifle.

Giffords’s Republican opponent in the recent elections, Jesse Kelly, went further, publishing as a campaign message, “Get on Target for Victory in November Help remove Gabrielle Giffords from office Shoot a fully automatic M16 with Jesse Kelly.” (The punctuation is his.)

Now this may have been a simple invitation to some “harmless” target practice with the candidate on a Saturday afternoon….. but it reads like incitement to murder. And Mr Kelly should have seen that possibility and therefore avoided the phraseology. On the other hand, perhaps he didn’t care.

Taken along with the crosshairs poster (see link above) his invitation becomes more of a (sorry about the pun) smoking gun.

There has been an unfortunate coarsening of political discourse in the US over my lifetime, to the extent that now the levels of vitriol are insane.

I mean that last word literally. (People have taken leave of their senses if they believe their present President is not a US citizen; or come to that, that he is a Muslim.)

I have mentioned this before when I predicted prior to his election that Barack Obama would be subject to non-stop hounding, and worse, if he were to be elected. What has occurred subsequently has, incredibly, surpassed those expectations of mine.

I repeat here that the problem seems to be that Republicans do not seem to accept the legitimacy of Democrats elected to office.

Democrats are somehow or other deemed to be un-American. (The echoes of McCarthy are not coincidental) and consequently demonised.

I realise that the problem of freedom and guns is not altogether new. And in my lifetime in the US political arena it has been Democrats, or those who could be thought not to be Republican, who have been the victims of assassination (the two Kennedys, Martin Luther King.)

President Reagan was shot, yes, but that did not seem to be a political act. Plus he survived.

Amazingly the same President Reagan seems to be the source of another quote about freedom:-

“Freedom is the recognition that no single person, no single authority or government has a monopoly on the truth, but that every individual life is infinitely precious, that every one of us put in this world has been put there for a reason and has something to offer.”

Note that.

Every individual life is precious.

It follows that you should not go around shooting people.

No matter what your disagreement with them.

The price of freedom is not only eternal vigilance, it is also restraint.

Real Americans And Real Presidents

Remember my prediction that Barack Obama would be plagued by Republicans questioning his right to be President from the moment of his inauguration?
I was taken to task by someone in a comment for the temerity of my suggestion.

However, I have now been borne out not just once, but twice*. And he’s only been President for six months!

*For, apparently [thanks to Almax for alerting me to this – unfortunately Alastair’s (extremely good) blog is restricted to 35 readers] there are folk saying Obama wasn’t born a US citizen and so is an illegal commander-in-chief. They are called Birthers and want to see his birth certificate.

This is part of what Almax wrote:-
“In the land of the cranks free there’s now a certain amount of steam behind a campaign based on the proposition that President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore cannot constitutionally be President.

Billboard

The proponents of this view are called “Birthers” and they have taken to erecting billboards like the one above, demanding to see the President’s birth certificate.
The latest development is that one of the Birthers, United States Army Major Stefan Frederick Cook has, via his lawyer, the superbly-named Orly Taitz, filed legal proceedings in the District Court of Georgia, for a restraining order to prevent the Government deploying him to Afghanistan.
While there might be lots of good reasons for not going to Afghanistan (eg I’m scared, mammy), here is the one advanced by Cook and Taitz –
“Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces.
Cook would be acting in violation of international law by engaging in military actions outside the United States under this President’s command, “simultaneously subjecting himself to possible prosecution as a war criminal by the faithful execution of these duties.”
Barack Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961. Hawaii became a US State in 1959.
Here is the birth certificate in question, which naturally Birthers say is a fake.

Birth certificate

Well, that might be a fake, but slightly more awkward is this August 1961 entry in the Honolulu Advertiser –

birth-notice

Some Birthers say that Government agents engaged in time-travel shenanigans and recently warped themselves back to ’61 to insert this notice ex post facto.
America? Dontchaluvit?

In the greatest democracy in the world© it would seem some Americans are not democrats at all. Even with a small d.

free hit counter script