<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Tale In The Sting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jackdeighton.co.uk/2009/11/11/a-tale-in-the-sting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jackdeighton.co.uk/2009/11/11/a-tale-in-the-sting/</link>
	<description>Writing, Fiction, Football and Whatever Takes My Fancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 11:56:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackdeighton</title>
		<link>http://jackdeighton.co.uk/2009/11/11/a-tale-in-the-sting/comment-page-1/#comment-5648</link>
		<dc:creator>jackdeighton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackdeighton.co.uk/?p=3067#comment-5648</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting Sarah.

I was just making a point about modern spelling of forenames; abominations like Kristofer and Shivon.
I must say, though, I grew up with Jackie as the spelling of the diminutive of Jacqueline. It was used both for girls called Jacqueline and for boys named Jack (or John) as a sort of nickname; as in Jackie Stewart (whose given name was John.)
I don&#039;t recall seeing &quot;Jacqui&quot; until relatively recently. I still think it&#039;s an ill usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting Sarah.</p>
<p>I was just making a point about modern spelling of forenames; abominations like Kristofer and Shivon.<br />
I must say, though, I grew up with Jackie as the spelling of the diminutive of Jacqueline. It was used both for girls called Jacqueline and for boys named Jack (or John) as a sort of nickname; as in Jackie Stewart (whose given name was John.)<br />
I don&#8217;t recall seeing &#8220;Jacqui&#8221; until relatively recently. I still think it&#8217;s an ill usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://jackdeighton.co.uk/2009/11/11/a-tale-in-the-sting/comment-page-1/#comment-5645</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackdeighton.co.uk/?p=3067#comment-5645</guid>
		<description>I agree with you generally, but do have argue the point about spelling her name.  To me, Jacqui is the common diminutive of Jacqueline (I know several women who use this form).  Jackie is a Scottish (racing driver) man&#039;s name.

(Here via Scottish Roundup)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you generally, but do have argue the point about spelling her name.  To me, Jacqui is the common diminutive of Jacqueline (I know several women who use this form).  Jackie is a Scottish (racing driver) man&#8217;s name.</p>
<p>(Here via Scottish Roundup)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A bad spell for Gordon Brown &#8211; Scottish Roundup</title>
		<link>http://jackdeighton.co.uk/2009/11/11/a-tale-in-the-sting/comment-page-1/#comment-5633</link>
		<dc:creator>A bad spell for Gordon Brown &#8211; Scottish Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackdeighton.co.uk/?p=3067#comment-5633</guid>
		<description>[...] to exploit the newspaper, assuming he&#8217;s not being tongue-in-cheek! However, Jack Deighton examines the circumstances surrounding the recording of the phone call and is extremely sceptical about the motives of Mrs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to exploit the newspaper, assuming he&#8217;s not being tongue-in-cheek! However, Jack Deighton examines the circumstances surrounding the recording of the phone call and is extremely sceptical about the motives of Mrs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Steel</title>
		<link>http://jackdeighton.co.uk/2009/11/11/a-tale-in-the-sting/comment-page-1/#comment-5628</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Steel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackdeighton.co.uk/?p=3067#comment-5628</guid>
		<description>Sadly, I agree with you. Things like this make you think that the death of newspapers may not be entirely bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I agree with you. Things like this make you think that the death of newspapers may not be entirely bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

